State v. Andre Chamberlain

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedAugust 31, 1998
Docket01C01-9710-CR-00490
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Andre Chamberlain (State v. Andre Chamberlain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Andre Chamberlain, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE FILED AUGUST SESSION, 1998 August 31, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Appellate Court Clerk C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9710-CR-00490 ) Appellee, ) ) ) DAVIDSON COUNTY VS. ) ) HON. J. RANDALL WYATT ANDRE CHAMBERLAIN, ) JUDGE ) Appe llant. ) (Direct Ap peal)

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

ROBERT P. BALLINGER JOHN KNOX WALKUP 601 Woodland Street Attorney General and Reporter Nashville, TN 37206 TIMOTHY F. BEHAN Assistant Attorney General 425 Fifth Avenu e North Nashville, TN 37243-0493

VICTOR S. JOHNSON District Attorney General

PAUL DEWITT Assistant District Attorney Suite 500, 222-2nd Avenue N. Nashville, TN 37201-1649

OPINION FILED ________________________

AFFIRMED PURSU ANT TO RU LE 20

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE OPINION

Appellant was convicted of one count of possession with intent to sell; two

counts of aggravated assault; one count of disorderly conduct; one count of

resisting arrest; and one count of evading arrest, from an incident where he

walked away from police afficers who approached the group in which he was

standing. The trial court sen tenced Ap pellant to a total of 40 yea rs by running the

possession and aggravated assault convictions consecutively. The rema ining

convictions were run concu rrently. State v. Cha mbe rlain, C.C.A. No. 01C01-

9509-Cr-00304, Davidson County (Tenn. Crim. App., Nashville, October 17,

1996).

On appeal this Court ruled that the aggravated assault offenses were

simp le assaults, and remanded the assault portion of the case for resentencing.

On remand, Appellant was sentenced to 11 months, 29 days at 100 percent for

both assault convictions . The Cou rt ran the two assa ult sentences c onsecutive

to each other and to the 20 year sentence for the sale of cocaine.

After a review of the record, we affirm the judgm ent of the trial court

pursuant to Court of Criminal Appeals Rule 20.

On appe al, Appellant contends his simple assault convictions should not

run consecutively to each other and to the 20 year sentence for the sale of

cocaine.

-2- The trial court corr ectly orde red the s entenc es to run consecutively since

this Court ruled in the initial appeal that Appellant’s consecutive sentences were

prope rly imposed. Cha mbe rlain, C.C.A.No. 01C01-9509-Cr-00304 slip op at 5-6

This holding is the law of this case.

Acco rdingly , we affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Court of

Criminal Appeals Rule 20.

____________________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE

CONCUR:

___________________________________ DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE

___________________________________ JOHN K. BYERS, SENIOR JUDGE

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Andre Chamberlain, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-andre-chamberlain-tenncrimapp-1998.