State v. Anderson

266 P.3d 221, 173 Wash. 2d 1013, 2012 WL 37075, 2012 Wash. LEXIS 46
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 5, 2012
Docket86723-2
StatusPublished

This text of 266 P.3d 221 (State v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Anderson, 266 P.3d 221, 173 Wash. 2d 1013, 2012 WL 37075, 2012 Wash. LEXIS 46 (Wash. 2012).

Opinion

266 P.3d 221 (2012)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Michele K. ANDERSON, Petitioner.

No. 86723-2.

Supreme Court of Washington.

January 5, 2012.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Chambers, Fairhurst, Stephens and Gonzalez, considered this matter at its January 4, 2012, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petitioner's Motion for Discretionary Review is denied. The Respondent's Motion to Appoint Counsel is denied.

/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 P.3d 221, 173 Wash. 2d 1013, 2012 WL 37075, 2012 Wash. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-anderson-wash-2012.