State v. Anderson

266 P.3d 221, 173 Wash. 2d 1013, 2012 WL 37075, 2012 Wash. LEXIS 46
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 171 Wash. 2d 764
Washington Supreme Court·Decided January 5, 2012·No. 86723-2·Published

Opinion

266 P.3d 221 (2012)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Michele K. ANDERSON, Petitioner.

No. 86723-2.

Supreme Court of Washington.

January 5, 2012.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Chambers, Fairhurst, Stephens and Gonzalez, considered this matter at its January 4, 2012, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petitioner's Motion for Discretionary Review is denied. The Respondent's Motion to Appoint Counsel is denied.

/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Anderson, 266 P.3d 221, 173 Wash. 2d 1013, 2012 WL 37075, 2012 Wash. LEXIS 46 (Wash. 2012).

266 P.3d 221 (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.