State v. Anderson, Unpublished Decision (11-30-2000)

CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 30, 2000
DocketCourt of Appeals No. L-00-1194, Trial Court No. CR00-1556.
StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Anderson, Unpublished Decision (11-30-2000) (State v. Anderson, Unpublished Decision (11-30-2000)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Anderson, Unpublished Decision (11-30-2000), (Ohio Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
This is a discretionary appeal from a judgment the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, for which leave was granted pursuant to R.C. 2945.67(A). Appellee, the state of Ohio, wished to appeal the trial court's finding of not guilty regarding a firearm specification.

R.C. 2945.67(A) provides that the state may appeal as a matter of right: a motion to dismiss all or any part of an indictment, complaint, or information, a motion to suppress evidence, a motion for the return of seized property, or a motion granting postconviction relief. All other appeals are by leave at the discretion of the court of appeals except, of course, that the state may not appeal a final verdict. State v.Matthews (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 375, 377-378.

In this case, we determined that the underlying "not guilty" verdict was final and, thus, not appealable and not subject to being reversed. Nevertheless, we initially granted leave to appeal issues involving the firearm specification. Upon further examination of the record, we now conclude that such a decision would be purely advisory and an improper exercise of judicial authority. See In re Collier (1993),85 Ohio App.3d 232; State v. Varner (1991), 81 Ohio App.3d 85, 86. Consequently, we conclude that this appeal was improvidently granted. See State v. Conti (1989), 57 Ohio App.3d 36; State v. Mills (Apr. 25, 1991), Cuyahoga App. No. 60385, unreported; State v. Damico (May 23, 1990), Hamilton App. No. C-880730, unreported.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Court costs of this appeal are assessed to appellant.

James R. Sherck, J., Richard W. Knepper, P.J., George M. Glasser, J., JUDGES CONCUR.

____________________________ JUDGE

Judge George M. Glasser, retired, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Varner
610 N.E.2d 476 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1991)
In Re Collier
619 N.E.2d 503 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1993)
State v. Conti
565 N.E.2d 1286 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1989)
State v. Matthews
691 N.E.2d 1041 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Anderson, Unpublished Decision (11-30-2000), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-anderson-unpublished-decision-11-30-2000-ohioctapp-2000.