State v. Anderson

Texas Supreme Court

State v. Anderson

34 Tex. 611

DecidedJuly 1, 1871

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Tex. 611 (State v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Anderson, 34 Tex. 611 (Tex. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Ggden, J.

The indictment in this-ease is sufficient to sustain the charge. The description of the animal taken Up and used, is more definite and certain than is usual in such cases; And the allegation that the animal was an estray is a sufficient allegation that the ownership was unknown. The court erred in sustaining the motion to quash the indictment. The judgment is reversed -and the ease remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ggden, J.

The indictment in this-ease is sufficient to sustain the charge. The description of the animal taken Up and used, is more definite and certain than is usual in such cases; And the allegation that the animal was an estray is a sufficient allegation that the ownership was unknown. The court erred in sustaining the motion to quash the indictment. The judgment is reversed -and the ease remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Tex. 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-anderson-tex-1871.