State v. Anderson

206 P.3d 1217, 228 Or. App. 237, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 322
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 29, 2009·No. 080431570; A139535·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, and two counts of failure to report as a sex offender, ORS 181.599(2), (3). He appeals the resulting judgment, assigning error to the trial court’s imposition of a compensatory fine on the ground that there was no evidence that the victim suffered any pecuniary loss. See State v. Donahue, 165 Or App 143, 145, 995 P2d 1202 (2000) (holding that “a compensatory fine may be awarded only if the trial court finds that the victim has suffered pecuniary loss as a result of the defendant’s criminal activities”). The state concedes that the record is legally insufficient to support the imposition of a compensatory fine. On review of the record, we agree and accept the state’s concession as well founded.

Compensatory fine vacated; remanded for resen-tencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Anderson, 206 P.3d 1217, 228 Or. App. 237, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 322 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

206 P.3d 1217 (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Anderson
206 P.3d 1217 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)