State v. Anderson

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Anderson

2017 Ohio 508, 69 N.E.3d 744, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1402

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 14, 2017

Docket2016-0317

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 508 (State v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Anderson, 2017 Ohio 508, 69 N.E.3d 744, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1402 (Ohio 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 26525, 2016-Ohio-135. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to stay Supreme Court proceedings, cancel oral argument, [1403]*1403and remand for application of State v. Aalim, and amicus curiae Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O’Brien’s motion for leave to file memorandum in support of the state of Ohio’s opposition to motion for stay, it is ordered by the court that the motions are denied.

O’Donnell, J., dissents and would cancel oral argument in the cause. French, J., dissents and would grant appellant’s motion and amicus euriae’s motion. O’Neill, J., dissents and would grant appellant’s motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery App. No. 26525, 2016-Ohio-135. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to stay Supreme Court proceedings, cancel oral argument, [1403]*1403and remand for application of State v. Aalim, and amicus curiae Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O’Brien’s motion for leave to file memorandum in support of the state of Ohio’s opposition to motion for stay, it is ordered by the court that the motions are denied.

O’Donnell, J., dissents and would cancel oral argument in the cause. French, J., dissents and would grant appellant’s motion and amicus euriae’s motion. O’Neill, J., dissents and would grant appellant’s motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 Ohio 508, 69 N.E.3d 744, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-anderson-ohio-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack