State v. Anderson

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Anderson

2010 Ohio 1109, 124 Ohio St. 3d 513

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 25, 2010

Docket2009-1761

StatusPublished

This text of 2010 Ohio 1109 (State v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Anderson, 2010 Ohio 1109, 124 Ohio St. 3d 513 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is not accepted.

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, on the authority of State v. Whitfield, 124 Ohio St.3d 319, 2010-Ohio-2, 922 N.E.2d 182, to the extent that the court of appeals directed the trial court to vacate the finding of guilt on one of the allied offenses.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is not accepted.

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, on the authority of State v. Whitfield, 124 Ohio St.3d 319, 2010-Ohio-2, 922 N.E.2d 182, to the extent that the court of appeals directed the trial court to vacate the finding of guilt on one of the allied offenses.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2010 Ohio 1109, 124 Ohio St. 3d 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-anderson-ohio-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack