State v. Anderson

2010 Ohio 1109, 124 Ohio St. 3d 513
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 25, 2010·No. 2009-1761·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is not accepted.

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, on the authority of State v. Whitfield, 124 Ohio St.3d 319, 2010-Ohio-2, 922 N.E.2d 182, to the extent that the court of appeals directed the trial court to vacate the finding of guilt on one of the allied offenses.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Anderson, 2010 Ohio 1109, 124 Ohio St. 3d 513 (Ohio 2010).

2010 Ohio 1109 (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Whitfield
2010 Ohio 2 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)