State v. Anderson

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Anderson

646 N.E.2d 179, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1485

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 1995·No. 95-414; No. S-91-26·Published

Opinion

Appellant has filed an untimely appeal of the court of appeals’ decision denying his motion for delayed reconsideration, and a motion for delayed appeal. This appeal involves a civil, post-conviction matter and not an appeal of a felony case to which the provisions for delayed appeal in S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(4) apply. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for delayed appeal be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that, in that appellant failed to perfect an appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1), this case be, and hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant has filed an untimely appeal of the court of appeals’ decision denying his motion for delayed reconsideration, and a motion for delayed appeal. This appeal involves a civil, post-conviction matter and not an appeal of a felony case to which the provisions for delayed appeal in S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(4) apply. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for delayed appeal be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that, in that appellant failed to perfect an appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1), this case be, and hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

State v. Anderson, 646 N.E.2d 179, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1485 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

646 N.E.2d 179 (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.