State v. Anderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Anderson

126 S.E.2d 134, 257 N.C. 336, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 374

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 259 N.C. 499 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 15, 1962·Published

Opinion

Pee Cukiam.

This is a companion appeal with State v. Poye, ante 326. Pleas were entered and sentences imposed at the same time as in the Poye case. Defendant herein and Pope made identical motions to vacate judgments, and rely on the same facts and legal principles to support the motions. Except for the indictments, sentences and the names of the defendants, the records and briefs in the two appeals are in all material respects the same.

On the authority of the opinion in the Poye case, the judgments entered by Judge Williams and the ruling and order of Judge Burgwyn are

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cukiam.

This is a companion appeal with State v. Poye, ante 326. Pleas were entered and sentences imposed at the same time as in the Poye case. Defendant herein and Pope made identical motions to vacate judgments, and rely on the same facts and legal principles to support the motions. Except for the indictments, sentences and the names of the defendants, the records and briefs in the two appeals are in all material respects the same.

On the authority of the opinion in the Poye case, the judgments entered by Judge Williams and the ruling and order of Judge Burgwyn are

Affirmed.

State v. Anderson, 126 S.E.2d 134, 257 N.C. 336, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 374 (N.C. 1962).

Pincite

126 S.E.2d 134 (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.