Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. . Anderson

State v. . Anderson

158 S.E. 925, 200 N.C. 806, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 460
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. . Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 196 N.C. 771 →
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 29, 1931·Published

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The defendant was indicted for violation of the prohibition laws. The State moved to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the record was not docketed within' the required time. The motion is allowed. S. v. Farmer, 188 N. C., 243.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Anderson, 158 S.E. 925, 200 N.C. 806, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 460 (N.C. 1931).

158 S.E. 925 (State v. . Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.