State v. . Anderson
158 S.E. 925, 200 N.C. 806, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 460
This text of 158 S.E. 925 (State v. . Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. . Anderson, 158 S.E. 925, 200 N.C. 806, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 460 (N.C. 1931).
Opinion
The defendant was indicted for violation of the prohibition laws. The State moved to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the record was not docketed within' the required time. The motion is allowed. S. v. Farmer, 188 N. C., 243.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
158 S.E. 925, 200 N.C. 806, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-anderson-nc-1931.