State v. Anderson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Anderson

369 S.W.3d 87, 2012 WL 2324065, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 838

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 19, 2012

DocketNo. ED 97394

StatusPublished

This text of 369 S.W.3d 87 (State v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Anderson, 369 S.W.3d 87, 2012 WL 2324065, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 838 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Anderson appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of murder in the first degree, pursuant to Section 565.020 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Anderson appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of murder in the first degree, pursuant to Section 565.020 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

369 S.W.3d 87, 2012 WL 2324065, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-anderson-moctapp-2012.