State v. Anderson

64 S.W.3d 850, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 19, 2002 WL 15598
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 293
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 8, 2002·No. No. ED 77691·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Andre Anderson, appeals from his conviction for felony stealing in violation of section 570.030, RSMo Cum. Supp.1997. He appeals, contending the trial court misapplied the best evidence rule. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Anderson, 64 S.W.3d 850, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 19, 2002 WL 15598 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

64 S.W.3d 850 (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.