State v. Anderson

580 S.W.2d 553, 1979 Mo. App. LEXIS 2879
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 8, 1979·No. No. 11231·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Defendant, charged as a second offender, was jury-convicted of uttering a forged check. After considering and overruling his motion for a new trial, the court afforded defendant allocution and sentenced him to imprisonment for a term of five years. Defendant appealed.

The approved transcript on appeal filed herein constitutes a representation by the parties that it includes all of the record in the cause. Rule 81.12(c), V.A.M.R. However, the transcript does not contain a judgment as mandated by Rule 27.11, V.A.M.R. This is not defendant’s fault and, therefore, his appeal will not be dismissed. Rather, the appeal will be held in abeyance and the cause remanded to the circuit court for entry of the required judgment. Upon receipt here of a supplemental transcript attesting entry of the proper judgment, the appeal will be reinstated. Until such receipt is made, the appeal will repose in limbo. State v. Hayes, 563 S.W.2d 99 (Mo.App.1978); State v. Rideeoutte, 560 S.W.2d 70 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Covington, 557 S.W.2d 59 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Jackson, 555 S.W.2d 99 (Mo.App.1977).

It is so ordered.

All concur, except FLANIGAN, C. J., dissents in separate opinion filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Anderson, 580 S.W.2d 553, 1979 Mo. App. LEXIS 2879 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979).

580 S.W.2d 553 (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Friend
605 S.W.2d 209 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1980)