State v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Anderson

261 N.W.2d 747, 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1437

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 13, 1978

DocketNo. 46604

StatusPublished

This text of 261 N.W.2d 747 (State v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Anderson, 261 N.W.2d 747, 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1437 (Mich. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of charges of aggravated robbery and kidnapping, Minn.St. 609.245 and 609.-25, subd. 1(2), and was sentenced by the trial court to a 3- to 15-year prison term for the robbery. Issues raised by defendant on his appeal relate to the sufficiency of the evidence and the propriety of the prosecutor’s closing argument. There is no merit to the first issue, and defendant is deemed to have waived the second issue by his counsel’s failure to object at trial to the prosecutor’s closing argument.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of charges of aggravated robbery and kidnapping, Minn.St. 609.245 and 609.-25, subd. 1(2), and was sentenced by the trial court to a 3- to 15-year prison term for the robbery. Issues raised by defendant on his appeal relate to the sufficiency of the evidence and the propriety of the prosecutor’s closing argument. There is no merit to the first issue, and defendant is deemed to have waived the second issue by his counsel’s failure to object at trial to the prosecutor’s closing argument.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 N.W.2d 747, 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-anderson-minn-1978.