State v. Anderson
217 N.W. 351, 173 Minn. 293
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment.- Defendant was convicted of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. On cross-examination he was required to testify over proper objection that he had first plead guilty to the accusation made in the information upon which he was on trial and that he thereafter withdrew such plea by leave of the court. This was error. Under such circumstances the former plea is held for naught. Kercheval v. U. S. 274 U. S. 220, 47 S. Ct. 582, 71 L. ed. 1009. A new trial is granted.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Anderson, 217 N.W. 351, 173 Minn. 293 (Mich. 1927).
217 N.W. 351 (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Jackson
325 N.W.2d 819 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)
People v. George
245 N.W.2d 65 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
State v. Sha
193 N.W.2d 829 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1972)
State v. Hayes
172 N.W.2d 324 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1969)
State v. Wright
427 P.2d 338 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1967)
People v. Spitaleri
173 N.E.2d 35 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
State v. Reardon
73 N.W.2d 192 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1955)
State v. Thomson
278 P.2d 142 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1954)
State v. Weekly
252 P.2d 246 (Washington Supreme Court, 1952)
State v. McGunn
294 N.W. 208 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1940)
Frantz v. State
1940 OK CR 108 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1940)
State v. McClain
292 N.W. 753 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1940)
People v. Street
284 N.W. 926 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1939)
State v. Cater
252 N.W. 421 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)
State v. Hook
219 N.W. 926 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1928)