State v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Anderson

179 So. 2d 15, 248 La. 414, 1965 La. LEXIS 2167

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 18, 1965

DocketNo. 47947

StatusPublished

This text of 179 So. 2d 15 (State v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Anderson, 179 So. 2d 15, 248 La. 414, 1965 La. LEXIS 2167 (La. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Percy James Anderson, Hubert Breda, John Henry Robinson and Arthur Lee Washington applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction; applicants have perfected no bills of exceptions, hence there is nothing to review. Code Crim.Proc.Arts. 498-504, R.S. 15:498-15:504; State v. Richardson, 220 La. 338, 56 So.2d 568; State v. LeBleu, 203 La. 337, 338, 14 So.2d 17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Percy James Anderson, Hubert Breda, John Henry Robinson and Arthur Lee Washington applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction; applicants have perfected no bills of exceptions, hence there is nothing to review. Code Crim.Proc.Arts. 498-504, R.S. 15:498-15:504; State v. Richardson, 220 La. 338, 56 So.2d 568; State v. LeBleu, 203 La. 337, 338, 14 So.2d 17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 So. 2d 15, 248 La. 414, 1965 La. LEXIS 2167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-anderson-la-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack