State v. Anderson
179 So. 2d 15, 248 La. 414, 1965 La. LEXIS 2167
Opinion
In re: Percy James Anderson, Hubert Breda, John Henry Robinson and Arthur Lee Washington applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.
Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction; applicants have perfected no bills of exceptions, hence there is nothing to review. Code Crim.Proc.Arts. 498-504, R.S. 15:498-15:504; State v. Richardson, 220 La. 338, 56 So.2d 568; State v. LeBleu, 203 La. 337, 338, 14 So.2d 17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Anderson, 179 So. 2d 15, 248 La. 414, 1965 La. LEXIS 2167 (La. 1965).
179 So. 2d 15 (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Richardson
56 So. 2d 568 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1951)
State v. Lebleu
14 So. 2d 17 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1943)