State v. Anaya
This text of State v. Anaya (State v. Anaya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A-1-CA-39203
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RICARDO ANAYA,
Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF ROOSEVELT COUNTY Donna J. Mowrer, District Judge
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM
for Appellee
Ricardo Anaya Portales, NM
Pro Se Appellant
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BOGARDUS, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge
WE CONCUR: ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge
SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Anaya, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-anaya-nmctapp-2022.