State v. Amiral

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Amiral. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Haw. 170
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 31, 2013·No. SCWC-11-0000374·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000374

31-MAY-2013

10:56 AM

SCWC-11-0000374

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.

JOHN N. AMIRAL, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000374; CASE NO. 1 DTI-10-123021)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, Pollack, JJ.)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time the application for certiorari was filed, see Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2011); see also Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Defendant-

Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed May 28, 2013, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2012) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 31, 2013.

Kevin O’Grady, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Loren Thomas, prosecuting attorney /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Amiral, (haw 2013).

State v. Amiral (State v. Amiral) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.