State v. Amiral
This text of State v. Amiral (State v. Amiral) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000374 31-MAY-2013 10:56 AM
SCWC-11-0000374
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
JOHN N. AMIRAL, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000374; CASE NO. 1 DTI-10-123021)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, Pollack, JJ.)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above
referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court
of Appeals at the time the application for certiorari was filed,
see Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2011); see also
Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Defendant-
Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed May 28,
2013, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application
pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2012) (“The application shall be
filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate
court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless
the time for filing the application is extended in accordance
with this rule.”). DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 31, 2013.
Kevin O’Grady, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Loren Thomas, prosecuting attorney /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Amiral, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-amiral-haw-2013.