State v. Ambrose

522 A.2d 904, 1987 Me. LEXIS 680
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided March 19, 1987·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Shawn Ambrose appeals from his conviction in the Superior Court, Penobscot County, after entering a conditional plea of guilty pursuant to M.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2) to operating under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Supp. 1986). Before the transfer of his case to the Superior Court, Ambrose had moved in .the District Court (Millinocket) to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a police investigatory stop. He now appeals from the District Court’s denial of that motion. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the District Court’s determination that the evidence was properly obtained was not clearly erroneous. See State v. Thurlow, 485 A.2d 960, 963 (Me.1984).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ambrose, 522 A.2d 904, 1987 Me. LEXIS 680 (Me. 1987).

522 A.2d 904 (State v. Ambrose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Thurlow
485 A.2d 960 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1984)