State v. Amaya
This text of 320 P.3d 673 (State v. Amaya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts of unlawful use of a deadly weapon with a firearm (Counts 2 and 3), felon in possession of a firearm with a firearm (Count 4), three counts of assault in the fourth degree (Counts 5, 6, and 7), and criminal mischief in the second degree (Count 8).1 In his first three assignments of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to merge the guilty verdicts on unlawful use of a deadly weapon with a firearm (Count 3) and felon in possession of a firearm with a firearm (Count 4) into a single conviction for felon in possession of a firearm with a firearm, and also erred in imposing consecutive sentences on those same counts. Our recent decision in State v. Flores, 259 Or App 141, 313 P3d 378 (2013), is dispositive of those assignments of error in favor of defendant. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions to merge the guilty verdicts on Counts 3 and 4 into a single conviction for felon in possession of a firearm with a firearm and for resentencing.2
Reversed and remanded with instructions to merge guilty verdicts for unlawful use of a deadly weapon with a firearm (Count 3) and felon in possession of a firearm with a firearm (Count 4) into a single conviction for felon in possession of a firearm with a firearm and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 P.3d 673, 260 Or. App. 763, 2014 WL 340271, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-amaya-orctapp-2014.