State v. Alvey
This text of 131 P.3d 765 (State v. Alvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was indicted on 10 counts of encouraging child sexual abuse in the second degree, a Class C felony. ORS 163.686. Defendant moved to dismiss on the ground that the statute under which he was charged contains the same substantive elements as ORS 163.687, a Class A misdemeanor. According to defendant, the two statutes thus impermissibly conferred on the district attorney discretion to charge the same conduct as either a felony or a misdemeanor, in violation of state and federal constitutional guarantees of equal treatment. The trial court agreed and dismissed the indictment. The state now appeals, arguing that, although the Oregon Supreme Court previously had concluded in State v. Pirkey, 203 Or 697, 281 P2d 698 (1955), that the state and federal constitutions prohibit such prosecutorial discretion, Pirkey has since been overruled.
The state is correct. City of Klamath Falls v. Winters, 289 Or 757, 781-82, 619 P2d 217 (1980); State v. Van Hoomissen, 125 Or App 682, 683, 866 P2d 521 (1994).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 P.3d 765, 204 Or. App. 681, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-alvey-orctapp-2006.