State v. Alvarez

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Alvarez

104 Ohio St. 3d 263

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 8, 2004·No. No. 2004-0289·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Thompson, 102 Ohio St.3d 287, 2004-Ohio-2946, 809 N.E.2d 1134, the convic[264] tion is reinstated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for execution of sentence.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jon W. Oebker, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Thompson, 102 Ohio St.3d 287, 2004-Ohio-2946, 809 N.E.2d 1134, the convic[264] tion is reinstated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for execution of sentence.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jon W. Oebker, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

State v. Alvarez, 104 Ohio St. 3d 263 (Ohio 2004).

Pincite

104 Ohio St. 3d 263 (State v. Alvarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related