Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Alvarez

State v. Alvarez

104 Ohio St. 3d 263
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 8, 2004
DocketNo. 2004-0289
StatusPublished

This text of 104 Ohio St. 3d 263 (State v. Alvarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Alvarez, 104 Ohio St. 3d 263 (Ohio 2004).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Thompson, 102 Ohio St.3d 287, 2004-Ohio-2946, 809 N.E.2d 1134, the convic[264]*264tion is reinstated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for execution of sentence.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jon W. Oebker, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Thompson
809 N.E.2d 1134 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 Ohio St. 3d 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-alvarez-ohio-2004.