State v. Altajir

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Altajir

10 A.3d 520, 299 Conn. 902, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 414

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 27, 2010·No. SC 18706·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 123 Conn. App. 674 (AC 31375), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to review the defendant’s claim that she was deprived of due process because the sentencing court allowed the state to introduce allegedly unreliable Facebook material into evidence, which the court relied upon at sentencing, and if so, whether the defendant was in fact deprived of her due process rights?”

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

*903 Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 27, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 123 Conn. App. 674 (AC 31375), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to review the defendant’s claim that she was deprived of due process because the sentencing court allowed the state to introduce allegedly unreliable Facebook material into evidence, which the court relied upon at sentencing, and if so, whether the defendant was in fact deprived of her due process rights?”

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

*903 Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 27, 2010

State v. Altajir, 10 A.3d 520, 299 Conn. 902, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 414 (Colo. 2010).

Pincite

10 A.3d 520 (State v. Altajir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related