State v. Altajir

10 A.3d 520, 299 Conn. 902, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 414
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 27, 2010
DocketSC 18706
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 A.3d 520 (State v. Altajir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Altajir, 10 A.3d 520, 299 Conn. 902, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 414 (Colo. 2010).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 123 Conn. App. 674 (AC 31375), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to review the defendant’s claim that she was deprived of due process because the sentencing court allowed the state to introduce allegedly unreliable Facebook material into evidence, which the court relied upon at sentencing, and if so, whether the defendant was in fact deprived of her due process rights?”

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

*903 Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 27, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Altajir
33 A.3d 193 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 A.3d 520, 299 Conn. 902, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-altajir-conn-2010.