State v. Alsup

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Alsup

2011 Ohio 227, 128 Ohio St. 3d 340

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 25, 2011·No. 2010-1748·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

State v. Alsup, 2011 Ohio 227, 128 Ohio St. 3d 340 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

2011 Ohio 227 (State v. Alsup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related