State v. Alston

169 S.E.2d 520, 6 N.C. App. 200, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1168
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided September 17, 1969·No. No. 6918SC405·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MallaRD, C.J.

Defendant was represented in Superior Court by Mr. Kenneth M. Carrington. In defendant’s brief it is asserted that Mr. Carring-ton was subsequently appointed district court judge before filing a brief herein and that defendant’s present attorney was substituted.

On the record in this case no error is asserted. The appeal itself is treated as an exception to the judgment. 1 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 26, p. 152.

The plea of guilty was freely, understandingly and voluntarily made. The warrant is in proper form. The judgment is in proper form and is supported by the warrant and the plea. The sentence imposed is not excessive. No prejudicial error appears on this record.

Affirmed.

Morris and Hedrice, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Alston, 169 S.E.2d 520, 6 N.C. App. 200, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1168 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).

169 S.E.2d 520 (State v. Alston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Fox
171 S.E.2d 85 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)