State v. Alston

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Alston

169 S.E.2d 520, 6 N.C. App. 200, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1168

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 17, 1969

DocketNo. 6918SC405

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 S.E.2d 520 (State v. Alston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Alston, 169 S.E.2d 520, 6 N.C. App. 200, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1168 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

MallaRD, C.J.

Defendant was represented in Superior Court by Mr. Kenneth M. Carrington. In defendant’s brief it is asserted that Mr. Carring-ton was subsequently appointed district court judge before filing a brief herein and that defendant’s present attorney was substituted.

On the record in this case no error is asserted. The appeal itself is treated as an exception to the judgment. 1 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 26, p. 152.

The plea of guilty was freely, understandingly and voluntarily made. The warrant is in proper form. The judgment is in proper form and is supported by the warrant and the plea. The sentence imposed is not excessive. No prejudicial error appears on this record.

Affirmed.

Morris and Hedrice, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI