State v. Alston

141 S.E.2d 793, 264 N.C. 398, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1202
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 5, 1965
Docket411
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 141 S.E.2d 793 (State v. Alston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Alston, 141 S.E.2d 793, 264 N.C. 398, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1202 (N.C. 1965).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We find no error in the judgment below denying petitioner a new trial. The findings of fact upon which the judgment is based are fully supported by the evidence. From a consideration of all the evidence, it is difficult to perceive how the judge could have arrived at any other conclusion.

The life sentence imposed at the trial is clearly unlawful and excessive. No specific punishment is prescribed by statute for conspiracy to murder. Murder is a felony. A conspiracy to commit a felony is a felony. State v. Terrell, 256 N.C. 232, 123 S.E. 2d 469. “Every person who shall be convicted of any felony for which no specific punishment is prescribed by statute shall be imprisoned in the county jail or State prison not exceeding two years ... , or if the offense be infamous, the person offending shall be imprisoned in the county jail or State prison not less than four months nor more than ten years, or be fined.” G.S. 14-2. A conspiracy to murder is an infamous offense. Upon defendant’s plea to the indictment, he was subject to a judgment of imprisonment for a term not to exceed ten years.

The life sentence imposed by the court at the October 1962 Term of the Superior Court of Franklin County, in consequence of petitioner’s plea of guilty to the indictment for conspiracy to murder Kinchen Williams, cannot be sustained. However, petitioner is not entitled to a discharge or a new trial. The plea stands. The life sentence is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Superior Court of Franklin County with direction that a proper judgment be entered. The court below, in pronouncing sentence, should be careful to so condition its judgment as *401 to allow petitioner credit for the time he has served in execution of the sentence herein vacated.

The proper officials of the State’s prison are directed to deliver the petitioner to the Sheriff of Franklin County prior to the convening of the Session of Superior Court for the trial of criminal cases to be held in said county next after the certification of this opinion.

Error and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Keen
214 S.E.2d 242 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
State v. Link
186 S.E.2d 634 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
State v. Wynn
180 S.E.2d 135 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
Jones v. Ross
257 F. Supp. 798 (E.D. North Carolina, 1966)
State v. Higgins
146 S.E.2d 681 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
State v. Darnell
146 S.E.2d 800 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 S.E.2d 793, 264 N.C. 398, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-alston-nc-1965.