State v. Alm
This text of 75 N.W.2d 212 (State v. Alm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff moves for a dismissal of the appeal of the defendant from the order of the District Court of Kandiyohi County denying defendant’s petition for a writ of coram nobis. The motion is made upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not served either upon the county attorney or the attorney general. Defendant concedes that such service was- not made. The appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 2
See, M. S. A. 632.02, 605.03; State v. Besse, 160 Minn. 533, 200 N. W. 356; State v. Newman, 188 Minn. 461, 247 N. W. 576. Whether the review should be some other remedy than appeal we need not determine.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 N.W.2d 212, 246 Minn. 568, 1956 Minn. LEXIS 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-alm-minn-1956.