Home/Supreme Court of Minnesota/State v. Alm

State v. Alm

75 N.W.2d 212, 246 Minn. 568, 1956 Minn. LEXIS 543
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided February 17, 1956·No. 36,810·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff moves for a dismissal of the appeal of the defendant from the order of the District Court of Kandiyohi County denying defendant’s petition for a writ of coram nobis. The motion is made upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not served either upon the county attorney or the attorney general. Defendant concedes that such service was- not made. The appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 2

2

See, M. S. A. 632.02, 605.03; State v. Besse, 160 Minn. 533, 200 N. W. 356; State v. Newman, 188 Minn. 461, 247 N. W. 576. Whether the review should be some other remedy than appeal we need not determine.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Alm, 75 N.W.2d 212, 246 Minn. 568, 1956 Minn. LEXIS 543 (Mich. 1956).

75 N.W.2d 212 (State v. Alm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Higgins
145 N.W.2d 478 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1966)
State Ex Rel. Danielsen v. Tahash
141 N.W.2d 390 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1966)
State v. Cage
117 N.W.2d 919 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1962)
State Ex Rel. Cole v. Tahash
116 N.W.2d 266 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1962)
State v. Alm
111 N.W.2d 517 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1961)
State v. Collins
109 N.W.2d 327 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1961)
State v. Lindquist
93 N.W.2d 521 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1958)
State Ex Rel. Farrington v. Rigg
78 N.W.2d 721 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1956)