Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/State v. Allums

State v. Allums

239 So. 2d 166, 256 La. 773, 1970 La. LEXIS 3589
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 30, 1970
DocketNo. 50760
StatusPublished

This text of 239 So. 2d 166 (State v. Allums) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Allums, 239 So. 2d 166, 256 La. 773, 1970 La. LEXIS 3589 (La. 1970).

Opinion

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted. See State v. Wells, 253 La. 925, 221 So.2d 50,, also dissent in State v. Lampkin, 253 La. 337, 218 So.2d 289, also Augilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723, also Art. 1 Sec. 7 La. Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aguilar v. Texas
378 U.S. 108 (Supreme Court, 1964)
State v. Lampkin
218 So. 2d 289 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1969)
State v. Wells
221 So. 2d 50 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 So. 2d 166, 256 La. 773, 1970 La. LEXIS 3589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-allums-la-1970.