State v. Allen Tercero

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 29, 2014
Docket01-14-00120-CR
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Allen Tercero (State v. Allen Tercero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Allen Tercero, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: The State of Texas v. Allen Tercero

Appellate case number: 01-14-00120-CR

Trial court case number: 10-DCR-056111

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant, The State of Texas, contends that, following the granting of appellee Allen Tercero’s motion to suppress “as to the blood draw without warrant,” the trial court should have filed findings of fact and conclusions of law. Appellant timely filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law on January 31, 2014, which the trial court denied. A trial court is required to make finding of facts and conclusions of law adequate to provide an appellate court with the basis upon which to review the trial court’s application of the law to the facts, following a request by the losing party on a motion to suppress evidence. See State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). The appeal is abated and remanded for the trial court to make written findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding its ruling on appellee Allen Tercero’s motion to suppress. The trial court shall make the appropriate findings and conclusions and shall cause them to be filed with the trial court clerk within 20 days of the date of this order. The trial court clerk is ordered to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law with this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when a supplemental clerk’s record that complies with this order is filed in this Court. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn Keyes  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 29, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cullen
195 S.W.3d 696 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Allen Tercero, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-allen-tercero-texapp-2014.