State v. Allen

100 S.E.2d 333, 247 N.C. 235, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 559
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Allen. Read the opinion of the Court — 245 N.C. 185
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 20, 1957·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s plea of former jeopardy cannot be sustained. At the time hearing of this case was suspended for a short time for the consideration of other court matters, the jury had not been impaneled. Hence jeopardy had not attached. State v. Brock, 234 N.C. 390, 67 S.E. 2d 282. The evidence was sufficient to require the submission of the case to the jury and to sustain the verdict.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Allen, 100 S.E.2d 333, 247 N.C. 235, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 559 (N.C. 1957).

100 S.E.2d 333 (State v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brock
67 S.E.2d 282 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
State v. Brock
67 S.E.2d 282 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)