State v. Allen

100 S.E.2d 333, 247 N.C. 235, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 559
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 20, 1957
StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E.2d 333 (State v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Allen, 100 S.E.2d 333, 247 N.C. 235, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 559 (N.C. 1957).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s plea of former jeopardy cannot be sustained. At the time hearing of this case was suspended for a short time for the consideration of other court matters, the jury had not been impaneled. Hence jeopardy had not attached. State v. Brock, 234 N.C. 390, 67 S.E. 2d 282. The evidence was sufficient to require the submission of the case to the jury and to sustain the verdict.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brock
67 S.E.2d 282 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
State v. Brock
67 S.E.2d 282 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E.2d 333, 247 N.C. 235, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-allen-nc-1957.