State v. Allen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Allen

896 S.W.2d 722, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 748, 1995 WL 225322

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Allen. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1441 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 18, 1995·No. No. 66178·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals following her conviction in a court-tried case of failing to place her vehicle not in motion as near the right-hand side of the road as practicable in violation of § 304.015 RSMo 1994. A two hundred dollar fine was imposed, plus costs. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no prejudicial error warranting reversal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opin[723]*723ion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals following her conviction in a court-tried case of failing to place her vehicle not in motion as near the right-hand side of the road as practicable in violation of § 304.015 RSMo 1994. A two hundred dollar fine was imposed, plus costs. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no prejudicial error warranting reversal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opin[723]*723ion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Allen, 896 S.W.2d 722, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 748, 1995 WL 225322 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

896 S.W.2d 722 (State v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.