State v. Allan
31 A.3d 383, 302 Conn. 949
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Nemiah ALLAN.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Katherine C. Essington, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.
Rita M. Shair, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn.App. 433, 27 A.3d 19, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court correctly refuse to adopt the buyer-seller exception to a charge of conspiracy to sell drugs?"
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Allan, 31 A.3d 383, 302 Conn. 949 (Colo. 2011).
31 A.3d 383 (State v. Allan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Porfil
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019
Saint Francis Hospital & Medical Center v. Malley
206 A.3d 241 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019)
Bell v. Commissioner of Correction
194 A.3d 809 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2018)
Bristol Board of Education v. State Board of Labor Relations
142 A.3d 304 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2016)
Clougherty v. Clougherty
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2016
In re Yasiel R.
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2014
State v. Allan
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2014