Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Allan

State v. Allan

31 A.3d 383, 302 Conn. 949
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 1, 2011
DocketSC 18879
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 31 A.3d 383 (State v. Allan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Allan, 31 A.3d 383, 302 Conn. 949 (Colo. 2011).

Opinion

31 A.3d 383 (2011)
302 Conn. 949

STATE of Connecticut
v.
Nemiah ALLAN.

SC 18879

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 1, 2011.

Katherine C. Essington, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Rita M. Shair, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn.App. 433, 27 A.3d 19, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly refuse to adopt the buyer-seller exception to a charge of conspiracy to sell drugs?"

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Porfil
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019
Saint Francis Hospital & Medical Center v. Malley
206 A.3d 241 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019)
Bell v. Commissioner of Correction
194 A.3d 809 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2018)
Bristol Board of Education v. State Board of Labor Relations
142 A.3d 304 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2016)
Clougherty v. Clougherty
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2016
In re Yasiel R.
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2014
State v. Allan
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2014

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.3d 383, 302 Conn. 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-allan-conn-2011.