State v. Alhamoud

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Alhamoud

36 S.W.3d 421, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 63, 2001 WL 91381

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 23, 2001

DocketNo. ED 77732

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 S.W.3d 421 (State v. Alhamoud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Alhamoud, 36 S.W.3d 421, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 63, 2001 WL 91381 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Walid H. Alhamoud was charged by indictment with one count of statutory rape, section 566.032 RSMo 1994, and two counts of statutory sodomy, section 566.062 RSMo. A jury convicted defendant of all charges. The court sentenced defendant to twenty years imprisonment on each charge to be served concurrently. Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Walid H. Alhamoud was charged by indictment with one count of statutory rape, section 566.032 RSMo 1994, and two counts of statutory sodomy, section 566.062 RSMo. A jury convicted defendant of all charges. The court sentenced defendant to twenty years imprisonment on each charge to be served concurrently. Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 S.W.3d 421, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 63, 2001 WL 91381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-alhamoud-moctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack