State v. Alfred

260 P. 1073, 145 Wash. 696, 1927 Wash. LEXIS 923
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1927
DocketNo. 20563. En Banc.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 P. 1073 (State v. Alfred) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Alfred, 260 P. 1073, 145 Wash. 696, 1927 Wash. LEXIS 923 (Wash. 1927).

Opinion

Peb Cueiam.

Upon a hearing of this cause En Banc, in which the trial judge, who is now a member of this court, took no part, the court finds itself equally divided; and for the reason, therefore, that a constitutional majority cannot be secured for a reversal of the case, the judgment of the lower court must be, and hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Serra v. National Bank of Commerce
178 P.2d 303 (Washington Supreme Court, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 P. 1073, 145 Wash. 696, 1927 Wash. LEXIS 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-alfred-wash-1927.