State v. Alford

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

State v. Alford

468 A.2d 434, 191 N.J. Super. 537, 1983 N.J. Super. LEXIS 995

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedOctober 20, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 468 A.2d 434 (State v. Alford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Alford, 468 A.2d 434, 191 N.J. Super. 537, 1983 N.J. Super. LEXIS 995 (N.J. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinions

The majority opinion of the court was delivered by

FURMAN, J.A.D.

Defendant was convicted on multiple counts for possession of heroin with intent to distribute, possession of cocaine and conspiracy to commit narcotics offenses, following his retraxit pleas of guilty. He was sentenced to an aggregate custodial term of 12 years, fines totaling $15,000 and penalties totaling $100.

On appeal defendant argues that the total fine imposed on him was not in accordance with the plea agreement between the prosecutor and himself. At the taking of defendant’s plea to two indictments, the assistant prosecutor stated that the maximum custodial term would be five years with no minimum parole ineligibility term and without reference to any fine and that “I’ve stated everything in the plea bargain.” At the taking of defendant’s plea to the third indictment, the court asked, after defendant stated that he understood that the maximum custodial term would be 12 years, “Was there a fine or just the [540]*540straight 12 years?” Defendant’s attorney responded, “Straight 12 years.” In sentencing, fines of $5,000 were assessed upon conviction on each of the three indictments.

In our view, as a matter of law the total fine of $15,000 was an integral and material part of defendant’s sentence and was beyond his reasonable expectations at the time of the entry of his pleas. We, therefore, vacate the entire sentence imposed on defendant and remand for resentencing, in accordance with State v. Kovack, 91 N.J. 476 (1982).

We reject as clearly without merit defendant’s additional argument that his aggregate 12 year custodial sentence was manifestly excessive and an abuse of judicial discretion. R. 2:11—-3(e)(2); State v. Whitaker, 79 N.J. 503, 512-514 (1979).

One other matter should be dealt with. The sentence improperly directed that one-half of the total fine and penalty be paid before defendant’s release. This mandate was an unwarranted infringement on the exclusive authority of the State Parole Board. N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.59(g); State v. Lavelle, 54 N.J. 315, 322 (1969).

We vacate the entire sentence imposed on defendant and remand for resentencing. The sentencing court may reimpose its sentence without the fines of $15,000. If it decides not to, defendant may withdraw his motion for resentencing and accept his original sentence; he may renegotiate a plea agreement; or he may withdraw his pleas of guilty subject to reinstatement of several dismissed counts and proceed to trial. We do not retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The majority opinion of the court was delivered by

FURMAN, J.A.D.

Defendant was convicted on multiple counts for possession of heroin with intent to distribute, possession of cocaine and conspiracy to commit narcotics offenses, following his retraxit pleas of guilty. He was sentenced to an aggregate custodial term of 12 years, fines totaling $15,000 and penalties totaling $100.

On appeal defendant argues that the total fine imposed on him was not in accordance with the plea agreement between the prosecutor and himself. At the taking of defendant’s plea to two indictments, the assistant prosecutor stated that the maximum custodial term would be five years with no minimum parole ineligibility term and without reference to any fine and that “I’ve stated everything in the plea bargain.” At the taking of defendant’s plea to the third indictment, the court asked, after defendant stated that he understood that the maximum custodial term would be 12 years, “Was there a fine or just the [540]*540straight 12 years?” Defendant’s attorney responded, “Straight 12 years.” In sentencing, fines of $5,000 were assessed upon conviction on each of the three indictments.

In our view, as a matter of law the total fine of $15,000 was an integral and material part of defendant’s sentence and was beyond his reasonable expectations at the time of the entry of his pleas. We, therefore, vacate the entire sentence imposed on defendant and remand for resentencing, in accordance with State v. Kovack, 91 N.J. 476 (1982).

We reject as clearly without merit defendant’s additional argument that his aggregate 12 year custodial sentence was manifestly excessive and an abuse of judicial discretion. R. 2:11—-3(e)(2); State v. Whitaker, 79 N.J. 503, 512-514 (1979).

One other matter should be dealt with. The sentence improperly directed that one-half of the total fine and penalty be paid before defendant’s release. This mandate was an unwarranted infringement on the exclusive authority of the State Parole Board. N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.59(g); State v. Lavelle, 54 N.J. 315, 322 (1969).

We vacate the entire sentence imposed on defendant and remand for resentencing. The sentencing court may reimpose its sentence without the fines of $15,000. If it decides not to, defendant may withdraw his motion for resentencing and accept his original sentence; he may renegotiate a plea agreement; or he may withdraw his pleas of guilty subject to reinstatement of several dismissed counts and proceed to trial. We do not retain jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

468 A.2d 434, 191 N.J. Super. 537, 1983 N.J. Super. LEXIS 995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-alford-njsuperctappdiv-1983.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack