State v. Alexis

154 P. 810, 89 Wash. 492, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 715
Washington Supreme Court·Decided February 4, 1916·No. No. 13084·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

Per. Curiam.

This case is identical in all respects with State v. Towessnute, just decided, except that it involves the rights of another tribe of Indians, the Lummi, and a different treaty, the Muckl-teeoh, proclaimed in 1859. The language involved in that treaty is the same as in State v. Towessnute, ante p. 478, 154 Pac. 805, and the same justification is attempted. The lower court in this case held with the state and, under our opinion in the other, did so correctly. This cause having been argued as one controversy with the Towessnute case, it will not be necessary to enlarge upon our opinion already rendered.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Alexis, 154 P. 810, 89 Wash. 492, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 715 (Wash. 1916).

154 P. 810 (State v. Alexis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Washington
827 F.3d 836 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
State v. Sattacum
50 Wash. 2d 513 (Washington Supreme Court, 1957)
State v. Satiacum
314 P.2d 400 (Washington Supreme Court, 1957)
State v. Tulee
109 P.2d 280 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)
State v. Wallahee
255 P. 94 (Washington Supreme Court, 1927)