State v. Alexander

320 S.W.3d 241, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1229, 2010 WL 3553867
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 14, 2010·No. ED 93754·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darrell Alexander (Alexander) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury trial, convicting him of one count of class C felony second degree domestic assault, in violation of Section 565.073. Alexander argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a continuance, by not ruling on his request to waive assistance of counsel, and by admitting evidence of his prior uncharged misconduct. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that Alexander is entitled to no relief on appeal. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the *242 parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Alexander, 320 S.W.3d 241, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1229, 2010 WL 3553867 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

320 S.W.3d 241 (State v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.