State v. Alexander

314 So. 2d 819, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13643
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 2, 1975·No. No. 74-1326·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

The above disposition of this appeal is not to be interpreted as ruling out the admissibility of a subsequent, independent identification by the same witnesses. See Hamrick v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1972, 465 F.2d 940, and Commonwealth v. Richards, Pa.1974, 327 A.2d 63.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Alexander, 314 So. 2d 819, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13643 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

314 So. 2d 819 (State v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Richards
327 A.2d 63 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)