State v. Aleshire

880 N.E.2d 482, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1505
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Aleshire. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Ohio St. 3d 402
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 6, 2008·No. 2007-1865·Published

Opinion

Licking App. No. 2007-CA-l, 2007-Ohio-4446. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2006-1973, State v. Sarkozy, Cuyahoga App. No. 86952, 2006-Ohio-3977; and briefing schedule stayed.

[1506]*1506Moyer, C. J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I, III, IV, and V. Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Aleshire, 880 N.E.2d 482, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1505 (Ohio 2008).

880 N.E.2d 482 (State v. Aleshire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sarkozy, Unpublished Decision (8-3-2006)
2006 Ohio 3977 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
State v. Aleshire, 2007-Ca-1 (8-29-2007)
2007 Ohio 4446 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)