State v. Aldrich

29 P.3d 1170, 175 Or. App. 643, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1182
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 8, 2001
Docket94CR0191TM; A85846
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 P.3d 1170 (State v. Aldrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Aldrich, 29 P.3d 1170, 175 Or. App. 643, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1182 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of its decision in State v. Fleetwood, 331 Or 511, 16 P3d 503 (2000). We have concluded in the case of a codefendant of this defendant that the error in erroneously admitting audio recordings was not harmless. State v. McCain, 175 Or App 274, 28 P3d 641 (2001). For the same reasons that we concluded that the error was not harmless as to the codefendant, we conclude that the error was not harmless as to defendant.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jury
57 P.3d 970 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 P.3d 1170, 175 Or. App. 643, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-aldrich-orctapp-2001.