Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Alderman

State v. Alderman

214 S.E.2d 433, 287 N.C. 261, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1101
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 6, 1975
StatusPublished

This text of 214 S.E.2d 433 (State v. Alderman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Alderman, 214 S.E.2d 433, 287 N.C. 261, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1101 (N.C. 1975).

Opinion

214 S.E.2d 433 (1975)
287 N.C. 261

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Dana ALDERMAN et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 1975.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Robert P. Gruber, Associate Atty., for the State.

Robert A. Farris, for defendant Alderman.

Fred W. Harrison, for defendant Whitaker.

I. Joseph Horton, for defendant Leak.

William R. Jenkins, for defendant Markham.

Petition by the Attorney General for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 25 N.C.App. 14, 212 S.E.2d 205. Denied. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Alderman
212 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 S.E.2d 433, 287 N.C. 261, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-alderman-nc-1975.