State v. Albert

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Albert

360 So. 2d 137, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16209

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 1978·No. No. 77-931·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Before us is a question of law certified to us by the circuit court as being proper for our consideration under Fla.App. Rule 4.6 (1962). We have determined this case to be controlled by Boyer v. City of Orlando, 232 So.2d 169 (Fla.1970) and therefore respectfully decline to answer the questions and remand this matter to the circuit court.

CERTIFICATE DENIED.

LETTS, J., and BLACK, SUSAN H., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Before us is a question of law certified to us by the circuit court as being proper for our consideration under Fla.App. Rule 4.6 (1962). We have determined this case to be controlled by Boyer v. City of Orlando, 232 So.2d 169 (Fla.1970) and therefore respectfully decline to answer the questions and remand this matter to the circuit court.

CERTIFICATE DENIED.

LETTS, J., and BLACK, SUSAN H., Associate Judge, concur.

State v. Albert, 360 So. 2d 137, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16209 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

360 So. 2d 137 (State v. Albert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related