State v. Albert
723 A.2d 810, 247 Conn. 954, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 10
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 715 (AC 15490), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court correctly instructed the jury regarding the meaning of ‘sexual intercourse’ under the facts of this case?”
NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Albert, 723 A.2d 810, 247 Conn. 954, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 10 (Colo. 1999).
723 A.2d 810 (State v. Albert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Albert
750 A.2d 1037 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)