State v. Albert

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Albert

723 A.2d 810, 247 Conn. 954, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 10

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJanuary 4, 1999

DocketSC 16059

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 723 A.2d 810 (State v. Albert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Albert, 723 A.2d 810, 247 Conn. 954, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 10 (Colo. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 715 (AC 15490), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court correctly instructed the jury regarding the meaning of ‘sexual intercourse’ under the facts of this case?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 715 (AC 15490), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court correctly instructed the jury regarding the meaning of ‘sexual intercourse’ under the facts of this case?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

723 A.2d 810, 247 Conn. 954, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-albert-conn-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack