State v. Al-Khafagi

304 P.3d 808, 257 Or. App. 363, 2013 WL 3294088, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 741
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 26, 2013·No. 090951207; A148012·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. State v. Hart, 299 Or 128, 139, 699 P2d 1113 (1985) (holding that the defendant was not entitled to a civil jury trial under the restitution statutes in ORS chapter 137); State v. N. R. L., 249 Or App 321, 329-30, 277 P3d 564, rev allowed, 352 Or 377 (2012) (explaining that subsequent amendments to the juvenile and criminal restitution statutes were intended to further deterrent and rehabilitative purposes).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Al-Khafagi, 304 P.3d 808, 257 Or. App. 363, 2013 WL 3294088, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 741 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).

304 P.3d 808 (State v. Al-Khafagi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hart
699 P.2d 1113 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. N. R. L.
277 P.3d 564 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2012)