Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Al-Khafagi

State v. Al-Khafagi

304 P.3d 808, 257 Or. App. 363, 2013 WL 3294088, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 741
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJune 26, 2013
Docket090951207; A148012
StatusPublished

This text of 304 P.3d 808 (State v. Al-Khafagi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Al-Khafagi, 304 P.3d 808, 257 Or. App. 363, 2013 WL 3294088, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 741 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. State v. Hart, 299 Or 128, 139, 699 P2d 1113 (1985) (holding that the defendant was not entitled to a civil jury trial under the restitution statutes in ORS chapter 137); State v. N. R. L., 249 Or App 321, 329-30, 277 P3d 564, rev allowed, 352 Or 377 (2012) (explaining that subsequent amendments to the juvenile and criminal restitution statutes were intended to further deterrent and rehabilitative purposes).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hart
699 P.2d 1113 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. N. R. L.
277 P.3d 564 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 P.3d 808, 257 Or. App. 363, 2013 WL 3294088, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-al-khafagi-orctapp-2013.