State v. Akim
This text of 300 P.3d 261 (State v. Akim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of fourth-degree assault, ORS 163.160, and harassment, ORS 166.065. On appeal, he asserts that the trial court erred in imposing two $500 unitary assessments on those convictions because the statute that provided for those assessments was repealed effective January 1, 2012. See former ORS 137.290(2)(b) (2009), repealed by Or Laws 2011, ch 597, § 118; Or Laws 2012, ch 89, § 1. The state agrees that the trial court erred in imposing the assessments because “no current statutory provision that applies to [defendant’s] fourth-degree assault and harassment convictions authorizes imposition of such an assessment.” We agree and accept the state’s concession. Accordingly, the case must be remanded for the trial court to enter a corrected judgment.
Reversed and remanded for entry of a corrected judgment deleting the $500 assessments on each conviction; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
300 P.3d 261, 256 Or. App. 352, 2013 WL 1683553, 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-akim-orctapp-2013.