State v. Akande

966 A.2d 237, 290 Conn. 918, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 54
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 5, 2009
DocketSC 18325
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 966 A.2d 237 (State v. Akande) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Akande, 966 A.2d 237, 290 Conn. 918, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 54 (Colo. 2009).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn. App. 596 (AC 27755), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*919 Decided March 5, 2009 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18325. Katherine C. Essington, special public defender, in support of the petition.
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant waived his claim that the jury instructions were constitutionally deficient?”

VERTEFEUILLE and MCLACHLAN, Js.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Akande
11 A.3d 140 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
State v. Guzman
7 A.3d 435 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
966 A.2d 237, 290 Conn. 918, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-akande-conn-2009.