State v. Akande

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Akande

966 A.2d 237, 290 Conn. 918, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 54

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 5, 2009·No. SC 18325·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn. App. 596 (AC 27755), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*919 Decided March 5, 2009 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18325. Katherine C. Essington, special public defender, in support of the petition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant waived his claim that the jury instructions were constitutionally deficient?”

VERTEFEUILLE and MCLACHLAN, Js.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn. App. 596 (AC 27755), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*919 Decided March 5, 2009 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18325. Katherine C. Essington, special public defender, in support of the petition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant waived his claim that the jury instructions were constitutionally deficient?”

VERTEFEUILLE and MCLACHLAN, Js.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

State v. Akande, 966 A.2d 237, 290 Conn. 918, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 54 (Colo. 2009).

Pincite

966 A.2d 237 (State v. Akande) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related