State v. Aimone

132 P. 1008, 89 Kan. 791, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 124
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJune 7, 1913
DocketNo. 18,217
StatusPublished

This text of 132 P. 1008 (State v. Aimone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Aimone, 132 P. 1008, 89 Kan. 791, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 124 (kan 1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The petition charges that from July 1, 1911, until August 3, 1911, Marion Aimone, his son, and his wife maintained a common nuisance upon premises owned'by the defendants, Lorenzo Peréllo and James Depoli, who knowingly permitted their property [792]*792to be devoted to unlawful purposes. The answer merely shows an injunction against Perello and Depoli affecting the same premises, granted on October 4,1909. On the face of the pleadings, the parties and the offenses involved in the two suits are different, and consequently the demurrer to the answer should have been sustained. {The State v. Kaemmerling, 83 Kan. 383, 111 Pac. 443.)

The; judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Kaemmerling
111 P. 443 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 P. 1008, 89 Kan. 791, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-aimone-kan-1913.