State v. Aillon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Aillon

322 A.2d 336, 166 Conn. 696

DecidedJuly 23, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 322 A.2d 336 (State v. Aillon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Aillon, 322 A.2d 336, 166 Conn. 696 (Colo. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s motion to modify the order of the trial court in the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County regarding his request for an extension of time in which to file a request for a finding and draft finding until ninety days after the trial court’s decision on his petition for a new trial is granted and, it appearing that during the pend-ency of this motion a new trial was ordered, the order of the trial court is modified to grant the defendant an extension of time in which to file a request for a finding and draft finding until ninety days after a decision by this court on the review of [697]*697the orders setting aside the verdicts and in the event the orders are vacated. Further requests for extensions of time are to he made in accordance with Practice Book § 665, as amended.

Howard A. Jacobs, special public defender, in support of the motion. Submitted June 6 decided July 23, 1974

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s motion to modify the order of the trial court in the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County regarding his request for an extension of time in which to file a request for a finding and draft finding until ninety days after the trial court’s decision on his petition for a new trial is granted and, it appearing that during the pend-ency of this motion a new trial was ordered, the order of the trial court is modified to grant the defendant an extension of time in which to file a request for a finding and draft finding until ninety days after a decision by this court on the review of [697]*697the orders setting aside the verdicts and in the event the orders are vacated. Further requests for extensions of time are to he made in accordance with Practice Book § 665, as amended.

Howard A. Jacobs, special public defender, in support of the motion. Submitted June 6 decided July 23, 1974

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

322 A.2d 336, 166 Conn. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-aillon-conn-1974.