State v. Ahmed

823 N.E.2d 455, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1450
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 2, 2005·No. 2001-0871·Published

Opinion

Belmont C.P. No. 99-CR-192. On motion for leave to amend, and on application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6). Motions denied because the appellant failed to comply with the 90-day filing deadline in S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6)(A).

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ahmed, 823 N.E.2d 455, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1450 (Ohio 2005).

823 N.E.2d 455 (State v. Ahmed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.