State v. Ahgil Ansari
This text of State v. Ahgil Ansari (State v. Ahgil Ansari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILE COPY
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 10, 2013
No. 04-13-00102-CR
The State of Texas, Appellant
v.
Ahgil Ansari, Appellee
Trial Court Case No. 386397
ORDER The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and the majority of the judges has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on Wednesday, October 2, 2013, to the following panel: Justice Angelini, Justice Barnard, and Justice Martinez. All parties will be notified of the Court’s decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. APP. P. 48.
Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.
It is so ORDERED on Tuesday, September 10, 2013.
______________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this Tuesday, September 10, 2013.
______________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Ahgil Ansari, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ahgil-ansari-texapp-2013.